Brandinium

Trademark search for:

ICONICLES

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2011-02-17 — Application filed
  • 2011-09-08 — Sn assigned for sect 66a appl from ib
  • 2011-09-12 — Application filed
  • 2011-09-12 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2011-09-14 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2011-09-15 — Office action issued
  • 2011-09-15 — Office action issued
  • 2011-09-15 — Office action issued
  • 2011-09-16 — Application filed
  • 2011-10-03 — Office action issued
  • 2012-03-19 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2012-03-19 — Office action issued
  • 2012-03-19 — Notice of revival - mailed
  • 2012-03-19 — Petition to revive-granted
  • 2012-03-19 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2012-03-19 — Teas petition to revive received
  • 2012-03-29 — Suspension letter written
  • 2012-03-30 — Letter of suspension mailed
  • 2012-04-11 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2012-10-01 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2012-10-01 — Assigned to lie
  • 2013-02-13 — Notification of possible opposition sent to ib
  • 2013-02-13 — Notification of possible opposition created, to be sent to ib
  • 2013-03-02 — Notification of possible opposition - processed by ib
  • 2013-04-01 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2013-10-01 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2014-02-06 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2014-04-02 — Office action issued
  • 2014-04-02 — Office action issued
  • 2014-04-02 — Office action issued
  • 2014-06-26 — New representative at ib received
  • 2014-10-02 — Teas request for reconsideration received
  • 2014-10-08 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2014-10-08 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2014-11-05 — Priority action written
  • 2014-11-05 — Priority action e-mailed
  • 2014-11-05 — Notification of priority action e-mailed
  • 2015-05-26 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2015-06-03 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2015-06-03 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2015-06-03 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2015-06-03 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2015-06-03 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2015-06-03 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2015-06-16 — Withdrawn from pub - og review query
  • 2015-07-15 — Notification of possible opposition sent to ib
  • 2015-07-15 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
  • 2015-07-15 — Notice of start of opposition period created, to be sent to ib
  • 2015-07-31 — Notification processed by ib
  • 2015-08-04 — Published for opposition
  • 2015-08-04 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
  • 2015-10-20 — Registered-principal register
  • 2016-01-20 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2016-04-05 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2016-04-05 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2016-06-09 — New representative at ib received
  • 2016-07-08 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2016-11-03 — New representative at ib received
  • 2017-01-05 — New representative at ib received
  • 2017-05-04 — New representative at ib received
  • 2020-10-20 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 71 (6-yr) e-mailed
  • 2021-02-17 — Final status recorded
  • 2021-11-02 — Death of international registration
  • 2021-11-02 — Notification of effect of cancellation of intl reg e-mailed

Owner Information

Iconicles Limited
London GB
Iconicles Limited
London GB
Iconicles Limited
London GB

Correspondent

Rebecca E. McDougall Miles & Stockbridge P.C.
1500 K Street NW
Suite 800
Washington, DC 20005

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2011-02-17
Status Date:
2021-02-17
Filing Year:
2011

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.