Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2011 ›
LA ›
LANCOACH
Trademark search for:
LANCOACH
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2011-10-18 — Application filed
2011-10-21 — Application filed
2011-10-21 — Application filed
2011-10-22 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
2012-01-08 — Assigned to examiner
2012-01-15 — Approved for pub - principal register
2012-01-31 — Assigned to lie
2012-02-01 — Law office publication review completed
2012-02-15 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2012-03-06 — Published for opposition
2012-03-06 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2012-03-07 — Teas change of owner address received
2012-03-07 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2012-05-01 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2012-10-31 — Sou teas extension received
2012-10-31 — Sou extension 1 filed
2012-10-31 — Sou extension 1 granted
2012-11-02 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2013-05-01 — Sou teas extension received
2013-05-01 — Sou extension 2 filed
2013-05-24 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2013-05-28 — Sou extension 2 granted
2013-05-29 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2013-12-02 — Application abandoned
2013-12-02 — Application abandoned
2013-12-02 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Sanofi
Paris FR
Sanofi
Paris FR
Correspondent
SUSAN UPTON DOUGLASS FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, P.C. 866 UNITED NATIONS PLZ NEW YORK, NY 10017-1822 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2011-10-18
Status Date:
2013-12-02
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.