Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2011 ›
LA ›
LANPLUS
Trademark search for:
LANPLUS
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2011-09-29 — Application filed
2011-10-03 — Application filed
2011-10-05 — Application filed
2011-10-06 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
2012-01-08 — Assigned to examiner
2012-01-15 — Approved for pub - principal register
2012-01-31 — Assigned to lie
2012-02-06 — Withdrawn from pub - managing attorney request
2012-02-06 — Law office publication review completed
2012-02-22 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2012-03-07 — Teas change of owner address received
2012-03-07 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2012-03-13 — Published for opposition
2012-03-13 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2012-05-08 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2012-09-21 — Sou teas extension received
2012-09-21 — Sou extension 1 filed
2012-09-21 — Sou extension 1 granted
2012-09-25 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2013-04-09 — Sou teas extension received
2013-04-09 — Sou extension 2 filed
2013-05-03 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2013-05-13 — Sou extension 2 granted
2013-05-14 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2013-12-09 — Application abandoned
2013-12-09 — Application abandoned
2013-12-09 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Sanofi
Paris FR
Sanofi
Paris FR
Correspondent
SUSAN UPTON DOUGLASS FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, P.C. 866 UNITED NATIONS PLZ NEW YORK, NY 10017-1822 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2011-09-29
Status Date:
2013-12-09
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.