Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2011 ›
PE ›
PENTOUCH TV
Trademark search for:
PENTOUCH TV
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2011-05-24 — Application filed
2011-05-27 — Application filed
2011-05-30 — Application filed
2011-05-31 — Notice of design search code mailed
2011-08-19 — Assigned to examiner
2011-08-26 — Final disposition recorded
2011-08-26 — Final disposition recorded
2011-08-26 — Final disposition recorded
2012-02-15 — Office action issued
2012-03-05 — Assigned to lie
2012-03-13 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2012-03-13 — Correspondence received in law office
2012-03-23 — Suspension letter written
2012-03-23 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2012-03-23 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2012-09-24 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2012-09-28 — Suspension inquiry written
2012-09-28 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2012-09-28 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
2013-02-26 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2013-02-28 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2013-02-28 — Correspondence received in law office
2013-03-08 — Suspension letter written
2013-03-08 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2013-03-08 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2013-08-28 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2013-09-05 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2013-09-05 — Correspondence received in law office
2013-09-12 — Examiners amendment -written
2013-09-12 — Approved for pub - principal register
2013-09-12 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2013-09-12 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
2013-09-12 — Examiner's amendment entered
2013-09-13 — Law office publication review completed
2013-10-02 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2013-10-22 — Published for opposition
2013-10-22 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2013-12-17 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2014-02-07 — Teas statement of use received
2014-02-07 — Use amendment filed
2014-03-02 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2014-03-13 — Statement of use processing complete
2014-03-19 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
2014-03-21 — Law office registration review completed
2014-03-22 — Notice of acceptance of statement of use e-mailed
2014-04-29 — Registered-principal register
2019-04-29 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
2019-07-09 — Teas change of correspondence received
2020-07-20 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2020-07-20 — Teas change of domestic representatives address
2020-07-20 — Teas change of owner address received
2020-07-20 — Teas change of correspondence received
2020-07-20 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2020-07-20 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2020-07-20 — Teas withdrawal of attorney received-firm retains
2020-07-21 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2020-07-21 — Teas change of owner address received
2020-07-21 — Teas change of correspondence received
2020-07-21 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2020-07-21 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2020-07-21 — Teas withdrawal of attorney received-firm retains
2020-12-04 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2020-12-04 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
LG Electronics Inc.
Seoul KR
LG Electronics Inc.
Seoul 150-721 KR
LG Electronics Inc.
Seoul 150-721 KR
Correspondent
Michael T. Smith BIRCH STEWART KOLASCH & BIRCH LLP 8110 Gatehouse Road, Suite 100 East Falls Church, VA 22042 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2011-05-24
Status Date:
2020-12-04
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.