Brandinium

Trademark search for:

POPBIG

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2011-03-23 — Application filed
  • 2011-03-26 — Application filed
  • 2011-03-28 — Application filed
  • 2011-03-29 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
  • 2011-03-29 — Teas amendment entered before attorney assigned
  • 2011-03-29 — Teas voluntary amendment received
  • 2011-06-20 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2011-06-23 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2011-06-23 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2011-06-23 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2011-12-21 — Office action issued
  • 2011-12-22 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2011-12-22 — Assigned to lie
  • 2011-12-22 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2011-12-28 — Office action issued
  • 2011-12-28 — Office action issued
  • 2011-12-28 — Office action issued
  • 2012-01-18 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2012-01-18 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2012-01-18 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2012-01-18 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2012-01-18 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2012-01-18 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2012-01-18 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2012-01-18 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2012-01-18 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2012-02-03 — Assigned to lie
  • 2012-02-06 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2012-02-22 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
  • 2012-03-13 — Published for opposition
  • 2012-03-13 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
  • 2012-03-18 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2012-03-18 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2012-05-08 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2012-09-25 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2012-09-25 — Sou extension 1 filed
  • 2012-09-27 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
  • 2012-10-02 — Sou extension 1 granted
  • 2012-10-03 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2013-05-08 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2013-05-08 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2013-05-08 — Sou extension 2 filed
  • 2013-05-08 — Sou extension 2 granted
  • 2013-05-10 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2013-07-14 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2013-08-17 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2013-08-17 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2013-08-20 — Teas withdrawal of attorney received
  • 2013-08-20 — Withdrawal of attorney granted
  • 2013-10-24 — Teas statement of use received
  • 2013-10-24 — Use amendment filed
  • 2013-11-07 — Statement of use processing complete
  • 2013-11-07 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2013-11-08 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2013-11-12 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2013-12-05 — Office action issued
  • 2013-12-12 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
  • 2013-12-12 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2013-12-12 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2013-12-18 — Law office registration review completed
  • 2013-12-19 — Notice of acceptance of statement of use mailed
  • 2014-01-21 — Registered-principal register
  • 2017-04-05 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2020-08-28 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
  • 2020-08-28 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

BEDROCK VC, INC
GREENWICH , CT
Georgiadis, Fotis
Waterford , CT
Georgiadis, Fotis
Waterford , CT
Georgiadis, Fotis
Santa Monica , CA

Correspondent

Georgiadis, Fotis
23 Twin Lake Drive
Waterford, CT 06385
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2011-03-23
Status Date:
2020-08-28
Filing Year:
2011

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.