Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2011 ›
RU ›
RUGGEDAPPS
Trademark search for:
RUGGEDAPPS
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2011-06-16 — Application filed
2011-06-20 — Application filed
2011-06-21 — Application filed
2011-06-22 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
2011-09-27 — Assigned to examiner
2011-10-05 — Final disposition recorded
2011-10-06 — Final disposition recorded
2012-04-06 — Paper received
2012-04-16 — Assigned to lie
2012-04-26 — Amendment from applicant entered
2012-04-26 — Correspondence received in law office
2012-05-17 — Suspension letter written
2012-05-18 — Letter of suspension mailed
2012-11-19 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2012-11-27 — Suspension inquiry written
2012-11-27 — Inquiry as to suspension mailed
2013-02-25 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2013-02-25 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2013-07-09 — Application abandoned
2013-07-09 — Application abandoned
2013-08-14 — Office action issued
2013-08-14 — Notice of revival - e-mailed
2013-08-14 — Petition to revive-granted
2013-08-14 — Teas petition to revive received
2013-08-21 — Suspension letter written
2013-08-21 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2013-08-21 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2013-08-21 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2013-08-21 — Correspondence received in law office
2014-02-05 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
2014-03-10 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2014-03-31 — Suspension inquiry written
2014-03-31 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2014-03-31 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
2014-09-10 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2014-09-16 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2014-09-16 — Correspondence received in law office
2014-09-18 — Suspension letter written
2014-09-18 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2014-09-18 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2014-10-30 — Teas change of correspondence received
2014-10-31 — Teas change of correspondence received
2015-03-05 — Teas change of correspondence received
2015-04-06 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2015-04-27 — Suspension inquiry written
2015-04-27 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2015-04-27 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
2015-10-14 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2015-10-21 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2015-10-21 — Correspondence received in law office
2015-11-04 — Suspension letter written
2015-11-04 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2015-11-04 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2016-05-04 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2016-05-25 — Suspension inquiry written
2016-05-25 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2016-05-25 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
2016-11-15 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2016-11-22 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2016-11-22 — Correspondence received in law office
2016-12-10 — Suspension letter written
2016-12-10 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2016-12-10 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2017-06-27 — Assigned to lie
2017-06-28 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2017-07-05 — Suspension inquiry written
2017-07-05 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2017-07-05 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
2018-01-31 — Application abandoned
2018-01-31 — Application abandoned
2018-01-31 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
RUGGEDCOM INC.
Concord CA
Correspondent
Filip A. Kowalewski Siemens Corporation 3501 Quadrangle Boulevard, Suite 230 Orlando, FL 32817 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2011-06-16
Status Date:
2018-01-31
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.