Brandinium

Trademark search for:

SIMUSCOUT

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2011-08-16 — Application filed
  • 2011-08-19 — Application filed
  • 2011-08-19 — Application filed
  • 2011-08-20 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
  • 2011-09-16 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2011-09-19 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2011-09-19 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2011-09-19 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2012-01-25 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2012-01-25 — Office action issued
  • 2012-01-25 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2012-02-11 — Office action issued
  • 2012-02-11 — Office action issued
  • 2012-02-11 — Office action issued
  • 2012-07-26 — Teas request for reconsideration received
  • 2012-07-26 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2012-07-27 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2012-07-28 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2012-07-30 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
  • 2012-07-30 — Ex parte appeal-instituted
  • 2012-08-25 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2012-08-25 — Exparte appeal terminated
  • 2012-08-25 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
  • 2012-09-06 — Assigned to lie
  • 2012-09-06 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2012-09-19 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
  • 2012-10-09 — Published for opposition
  • 2012-10-09 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
  • 2012-12-04 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2013-06-04 — Sou extension 1 filed
  • 2013-07-08 — Application abandoned
  • 2013-07-08 — Application abandoned
  • 2013-08-09 — Sou extension received with teas petition
  • 2013-08-09 — Petition to revive-granted
  • 2013-08-09 — Teas petition to revive received
  • 2013-08-10 — Notice of revival - e-mailed
  • 2013-09-06 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
  • 2013-09-09 — Sou extension 1 granted
  • 2013-09-10 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2013-12-03 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2013-12-03 — Sou extension 2 filed
  • 2013-12-16 — Sou extension 2 granted
  • 2013-12-17 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2014-06-04 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2014-06-04 — Sou extension 3 filed
  • 2014-06-12 — Sou extension 3 granted
  • 2014-06-13 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2014-09-15 — Teas withdrawal of attorney received-firm retains
  • 2014-09-18 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2014-12-04 — Sou extension 4 filed
  • 2014-12-28 — Sou extension received with teas petition
  • 2014-12-28 — Petition to revive-granted
  • 2014-12-28 — Teas petition to revive received
  • 2014-12-29 — Notice of revival - e-mailed
  • 2015-01-09 — Sou extension 4 granted
  • 2015-01-10 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2015-06-02 — Teas statement of use received
  • 2015-06-02 — Use amendment filed
  • 2015-06-18 — Statement of use processing complete
  • 2015-07-13 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
  • 2015-07-14 — Notice of acceptance of statement of use e-mailed
  • 2015-08-18 — Registered-principal register
  • 2020-08-18 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
  • 2022-03-04 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
  • 2022-03-04 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

L-3 Communications Corporation
New York , NY
L-3 Communications Corporation
New York , NY
L-3 Communications Corporation
New York , NY

Correspondent

MERRY L. BIGGERSTAFF TIAJOLOFF & KELLY LLP
405 LEXINGTON AVE
NEW YORK, NY 10174-0002
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2011-08-16
Status Date:
2022-03-04
Filing Year:
2011

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.