Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2011 ›
SO ›
SOCIALOCUS
Trademark search for:
SOCIALOCUS
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2011-09-28 — Application filed
2011-10-01 — Application filed
2011-10-04 — Application filed
2011-10-05 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
2012-01-17 — Assigned to examiner
2012-01-19 — Final disposition recorded
2012-01-19 — Final disposition recorded
2012-01-19 — Final disposition recorded
2012-05-04 — Assigned to examiner
2012-07-17 — Teas change of correspondence received
2012-07-17 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2012-07-17 — Office action issued
2012-07-17 — Correspondence received in law office
2012-07-20 — Suspension letter written
2012-07-20 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2012-07-20 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2013-01-23 — Assigned to lie
2013-01-24 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2013-07-24 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2014-01-24 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2014-01-24 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2014-07-30 — Office action issued
2014-07-30 — Office action issued
2014-07-30 — Office action issued
2015-02-25 — Application abandoned
2015-02-25 — Application abandoned
2015-02-25 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Valuepitch eTechnologies Pvt Ltd
Mumbai IN
Correspondent
Valuepitch eTechnologies Pvt Ltd Opp: Pizza Hut, Powai 217/219 Powai Plaza, Hiranandai Gardens MUMBAI, 400076
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2011-09-28
Status Date:
2015-02-25
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.