Trademark search for:

SUPER HI-VISION

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2011-12-15 — Application filed
2011-12-19 — Application filed
2011-12-22 — Application filed
2011-12-23 — Notice of design search code mailed
2012-03-23 — Assigned to examiner
2012-03-25 — Final disposition recorded
2012-03-26 — Final disposition recorded
2012-08-20 — Office action issued
2012-08-23 — Preliminary/voluntary amendment - entered
2012-08-23 — Assigned to lie
2012-09-12 — Office action issued
2012-09-12 — Office action issued
2013-03-07 — Teas request for reconsideration received
2013-03-07 — Correspondence received in law office
2013-03-08 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2013-03-14 — Approved for pub - principal register
2013-03-19 — Law office publication review completed
2013-03-31 — Withdrawn from pub - og review query
2013-05-08 — Notice of publication
2013-05-28 — Published for opposition
2013-07-23 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2013-09-12 — Teas delete 1(b) basis received
2013-09-12 — Notice of allowance cancelled
2013-10-22 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2013-10-22 — 1(b) basis deleted; proceed to registration
2013-11-26 — Registered-principal register
2020-07-03 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2020-07-03 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

NIPPON HOSO KYOKAI
Tokyo JP

NIPPON HOSO KYOKAI
Tokyo JP

NIPPON HOSO KYOKAI
Tokyo JP

Correspondent

BRENT E. ROUTMAN MERCHANT & GOULD P.C.
PO BOX 2910
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0910
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2011-12-15

Status Date:
2020-07-03

Category:
Electronics & Software

Filing Year:
2011

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.