Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2011 ›
TE ›
TENCENTWEIBO
Trademark search for:
TENCENTWEIBO
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2011-10-25 — Application filed
2011-10-28 — Application filed
2011-10-28 — Application filed
2011-10-29 — Notice of design search code mailed
2012-01-09 — Assigned to examiner
2012-01-11 — Final disposition recorded
2012-01-11 — Final disposition recorded
2012-01-11 — Final disposition recorded
2012-07-11 — Office action issued
2012-07-11 — Correspondence received in law office
2012-07-12 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2012-07-31 — Suspension letter written
2012-07-31 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2012-07-31 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2013-01-31 — Assigned to lie
2013-01-31 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2013-02-08 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
2013-02-08 — Suspension inquiry written
2013-02-08 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2013-08-07 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2013-08-07 — Correspondence received in law office
2013-08-08 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2013-08-26 — Office action issued
2013-08-26 — Office action issued
2013-08-26 — Office action issued
2014-01-21 — Teas request for reconsideration received
2014-01-24 — Correspondence received in law office
2014-01-24 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2014-01-27 — Approved for pub - principal register
2014-01-29 — Suspension letter written
2014-01-29 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2014-01-29 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2014-01-29 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
2014-01-31 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2014-01-31 — Correspondence received in law office
2014-01-31 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2014-02-04 — Approved for pub - principal register
2014-02-04 — Law office publication review completed
2014-02-14 — Letter of protest evidence forwarded
2014-02-18 — Letter of protest evidence reviewed-no further action taken
2014-03-05 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2014-03-25 — Published for opposition
2014-03-25 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2014-03-26 — Opposition papers received at ttab
2014-03-26 — Opposition instituted no. 999999
2016-01-28 — Teas change of correspondence received
2018-01-22 — Opposition terminated no. 999999
2018-01-22 — Opposition dismissed no. 999999
2018-01-22 — Ttab release case to trademarks
2018-03-06 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2018-04-02 — Teas delete 1(b) basis received
2018-04-02 — Notice of allowance cancelled
2018-04-02 — Teas change of owner address received
2018-04-02 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2018-04-30 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2018-05-05 — 1(b) basis deleted; proceed to registration
2018-06-12 — Registered-principal register
2018-08-02 — Fax received
2018-11-08 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
2020-08-13 — Review of correspondence complete - information made of record
2023-06-12 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
2023-09-25 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2023-09-25 — Teas change of correspondence received
2023-09-25 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2024-12-27 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2024-12-27 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Tencent Holdings Limited
Grand Cayman KY
Tencent Holdings Limited
Grand Cayman KY
Tencent Holdings Limited
Grand Cayman KY
Correspondent
Angela Alvarez Sujek Miller Johnson 45 Ottawa Ave SW, Suite 1100 Grand Rapids, MI 49503 United States
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2011-10-25
Status Date:
2024-12-27
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.