Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2011 ›
TH ›
THEKNODE
Trademark search for:
THEKNODE
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2011-09-20 — Application filed
2011-09-23 — Application filed
2011-09-24 — Application filed
2012-01-06 — Assigned to examiner
2012-01-10 — Final disposition recorded
2012-01-10 — Final disposition recorded
2012-01-10 — Final disposition recorded
2012-01-25 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
2012-07-02 — Office action issued
2012-07-12 — Assigned to lie
2012-07-19 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2012-07-19 — Correspondence received in law office
2012-07-23 — Office action issued
2012-07-23 — Office action issued
2012-07-23 — Office action issued
2012-11-14 — Teas request for reconsideration received
2012-11-14 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2012-11-14 — Correspondence received in law office
2012-11-30 — Action req for recon denied no appeal filed counted not mailed
2012-11-30 — Action req for recon denied no appeal filed counted not mailed
2012-11-30 — Action for req for recon denied no appeal filed e-mailed
2012-11-30 — Action for req for recon denied no appeal filed e-mailed
2012-11-30 — Notification for req for recon denied no appeal filed
2012-11-30 — Notification for req for recon denied no appeal filed
2012-12-17 — Examiners amendment -written
2012-12-17 — Approved for pub - principal register
2012-12-17 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2012-12-17 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
2012-12-17 — Examiner's amendment entered
2013-01-10 — Law office publication review completed
2013-01-20 — Withdrawn from pub - og review query
2013-02-05 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
2013-02-07 — Final disposition recorded
2013-02-07 — Final disposition recorded
2013-02-07 — Final disposition recorded
2013-03-07 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2013-03-07 — Office action issued
2013-03-07 — Correspondence received in law office
2013-03-11 — Approved for pub - principal register
2013-03-18 — Law office publication review completed
2013-04-03 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2013-04-23 — Published for opposition
2013-04-23 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2013-06-18 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2013-12-18 — Sou teas extension received
2013-12-18 — Sou extension 1 filed
2014-01-31 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2014-02-05 — Sou extension 1 granted
2014-02-06 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2014-04-29 — Teas statement of use received
2014-04-29 — Use amendment filed
2014-05-06 — Statement of use processing complete
2014-05-08 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
2014-05-19 — Law office registration review completed
2014-05-20 — Notice of acceptance of statement of use e-mailed
2014-06-24 — Registered-principal register
2019-01-29 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2019-01-29 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2019-06-24 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
2019-08-07 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
2019-11-06 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
2019-11-06 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
2021-01-29 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2021-01-29 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
PREMIER FARNELL LTD
LEEDS
PREMIER FARNELL PLC
LEEDS GB
PREMIER FARNELL PLC
LEEDS GB
PREMIER FARNELL PLC
LEEDS GB
Celdis Limited
Leeds GB
Correspondent
Gina L. Durham, Esq. DLA Piper LLP (US) 555 Mission Street, Suite 2400 San Francisco, CA 94105-2933 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2011-09-20
Status Date:
2021-01-29
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.