Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2011 ›
UB ›
UBERCAR
Trademark search for:
UBERCAR
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2011-02-24 — Application filed
2011-02-28 — Application filed
2011-03-01 — Application filed
2011-03-02 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
2011-05-26 — Assigned to examiner
2011-05-27 — Approved for pub - principal register
2011-07-05 — Published for opposition
2011-07-05 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2011-08-30 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2012-02-23 — Sou teas extension received
2012-02-23 — Sou extension 1 filed
2012-03-17 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2012-03-19 — Sou extension 1 granted
2012-03-20 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2012-05-31 — Sou teas extension received
2012-05-31 — Sou extension 2 filed
2012-06-07 — Sou extension 2 granted
2012-06-08 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2012-09-14 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2012-09-14 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2013-04-01 — Application abandoned
2013-04-01 — Application abandoned
2013-04-01 — Final status recorded
2014-09-22 — Teas change of owner address received
2014-09-22 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
Owner Information
Uber Technologies Inc.
San Francisco , CA
Uber Technologies Inc.
San Francisco , CA
Correspondent
Sally M. Abel Fenwick & West LLP 801 California Street Mountain View, CA 94041 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2011-02-24
Status Date:
2013-04-01
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.