Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2011 ›
UL ›
µ LAM
Trademark search for:
µ LAM
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2011-10-27 — Application filed
2011-12-22 — Sn assigned for sect 66a appl from ib
2011-12-27 — Application filed
2011-12-31 — Application filed
2012-02-15 — Assigned to examiner
2012-02-21 — Final disposition recorded
2012-02-22 — Office action issued
2012-02-24 — Office action issued
2012-02-24 — Office action issued
2012-03-24 — Office action issued
2012-08-20 — Office action issued
2012-08-20 — Correspondence received in law office
2012-08-21 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2012-09-11 — Office action issued
2012-09-11 — Office action issued
2012-09-11 — Office action issued
2013-04-10 — Application abandoned
2013-04-10 — Application abandoned
2013-05-22 — Notification of possible opposition sent to ib
2013-05-22 — Notification of possible opposition created, to be sent to ib
2013-06-08 — Notification of possible opposition - processed by ib
2014-04-10 — Final disposition recorded
2014-04-10 — Final disposition recorded
2014-04-25 — Final disposition recorded
2017-05-04 — New representative at ib received
2019-06-06 — New representative at ib received
2021-10-27 — Final status recorded
2022-05-22 — Death of international registration
2022-05-23 — Notification of effect of cancellation of intl reg e-mailed
Correspondent
David R Haarz Harness, Dickey & Pierce, PLC 11730 Plaza America Dr Suite 600 Reston, VA 20190
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2011-10-27
Status Date:
2021-10-27
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.