Brandinium

Trademark search for:

VERTX EVO

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2011-01-17 — Application filed
  • 2011-01-20 — Application filed
  • 2011-01-21 — Application filed
  • 2011-01-22 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
  • 2011-03-14 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2011-03-15 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2011-03-15 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2011-05-24 — Office action issued
  • 2011-06-01 — Assigned to lie
  • 2011-06-04 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2011-06-04 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2011-06-29 — Suspension letter written
  • 2011-06-30 — Letter of suspension mailed
  • 2011-12-30 — Assigned to lie
  • 2011-12-30 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2012-01-11 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2012-01-11 — Inquiry as to suspension mailed
  • 2012-06-27 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2012-07-11 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2012-07-11 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2012-08-08 — Suspension letter written
  • 2012-08-09 — Letter of suspension mailed
  • 2013-02-13 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2013-03-07 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2013-03-07 — Inquiry as to suspension mailed
  • 2013-10-03 — Application abandoned
  • 2013-10-03 — Application abandoned
  • 2013-10-08 — Teas petition to revive received
  • 2013-10-08 — Petition to revive-granted
  • 2013-10-08 — Office action issued
  • 2013-10-09 — Notice of revival - mailed
  • 2013-10-15 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2013-10-15 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2013-11-04 — Suspension letter written
  • 2013-11-05 — Letter of suspension mailed
  • 2014-05-07 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2014-05-15 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2014-05-15 — Inquiry as to suspension mailed
  • 2014-11-12 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2014-11-19 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2014-11-19 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2014-11-20 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2014-12-02 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2014-12-17 — Notice of publication
  • 2015-01-06 — Published for opposition
  • 2015-03-24 — Registered-principal register
  • 2019-12-19 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2019-12-19 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2020-02-28 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2020-02-28 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2020-02-28 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2020-02-28 — Teas withdrawal of attorney received-firm retains
  • 2020-02-28 — Teas withdrawal as domestic representative received
  • 2020-02-28 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2020-02-28 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2020-03-10 — Review of correspondence complete - power of attorney entered
  • 2020-03-24 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
  • 2021-02-04 — Teas section 8 & 15 received
  • 2021-06-10 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
  • 2021-06-10 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
  • 2021-06-10 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 & 15 - e-mailed
  • 2024-03-24 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
  • 2025-10-10 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
  • 2025-10-10 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Assa Abloy AB
Stockholm SE
Assa Abloy AB
Stockholm SE
Assa Abloy AB
Stockholm SE

Correspondent

Mainak H. Mehta Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP
525 B. Street
San Diego, CA 92101
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2011-01-17
Status Date:
2025-10-10
Filing Year:
2011

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.