Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2012 ›
BE ›
BETTER IN 7
Trademark search for:
BETTER IN 7
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2012-05-21 — Application filed
2012-05-24 — Application filed
2012-05-25 — Application filed
2012-05-26 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
2012-09-11 — Assigned to examiner
2012-09-19 — Priority action written
2012-09-19 — Priority action e-mailed
2012-09-19 — Notification of priority action e-mailed
2013-03-13 — Office action issued
2013-03-13 — Correspondence received in law office
2013-03-14 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2013-03-15 — Approved for pub - principal register
2013-03-30 — Assigned to lie
2013-03-30 — Law office publication review completed
2013-04-17 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2013-05-07 — Published for opposition
2013-05-07 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2013-07-02 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2013-12-26 — Sou teas extension received
2013-12-26 — Sou extension 1 filed
2014-01-31 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2014-02-05 — Sou extension 1 granted
2014-02-06 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2014-08-04 — Application abandoned
2014-08-04 — Application abandoned
2014-08-04 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Better in 7, Inc.
Los Angeles , CA
Better in 7, Inc.
Pacific Palisades , CA
Correspondent
CHRISTOPHER CHATHAM CHATHAM & HOGAN, LLP 11240 MAGNOLIA BLVD STE 104 NORTH HOLLYWOOD, CA 91601-3790 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2012-05-21
Status Date:
2014-08-04
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.