Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2012 ›
CA ›
CARBONWATCH
Trademark search for:
CARBONWATCH
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2012-10-24 — Application filed
2012-10-27 — Application filed
2012-10-30 — Application filed
2012-10-31 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
2013-02-22 — Assigned to examiner
2013-02-27 — Suspension letter written
2013-02-27 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2013-02-27 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2013-08-29 — Assigned to lie
2013-09-03 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2013-09-26 — Suspension inquiry written
2013-09-26 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2013-09-26 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
2014-03-17 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2014-03-24 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2014-03-24 — Correspondence received in law office
2014-04-03 — Suspension letter written
2014-04-03 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2014-04-03 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2014-10-07 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2014-10-17 — Suspension inquiry written
2014-10-17 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2014-10-17 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
2015-04-01 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2015-04-08 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2015-04-08 — Correspondence received in law office
2015-04-13 — Suspension letter written
2015-04-13 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2015-04-13 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2015-10-13 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2015-10-31 — Suspension inquiry written
2015-10-31 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2015-10-31 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
2016-04-12 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2016-04-27 — Suspension letter written
2016-04-27 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2016-04-27 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2016-04-27 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2016-04-27 — Assigned to lie
2016-04-27 — Correspondence received in law office
2016-10-31 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2016-11-08 — Suspension inquiry written
2016-11-08 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2016-11-08 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
2017-04-25 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2017-05-01 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2017-05-01 — Correspondence received in law office
2017-05-15 — Suspension letter written
2017-05-15 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2017-05-15 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2017-11-28 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2017-11-30 — Suspension inquiry written
2017-11-30 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2017-11-30 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
2018-05-25 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2018-05-29 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2018-05-29 — Correspondence received in law office
2018-05-31 — Approved for pub - principal register
2018-06-05 — Law office publication review completed
2018-06-20 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2018-07-10 — Published for opposition
2018-07-10 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2018-09-04 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2019-04-08 — Application abandoned
2019-04-08 — Application abandoned
2019-04-08 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Green Ride Global Inc.
Toronto, Ontario CA
Green Ride Global Inc.
Toronto, Ontario CA
Correspondent
TIMOTHY J. SINNOTT BERESKIN & PARR LLP/S.E.N.C.R.L.,S.R.L. 40 KING STREET WEST, 40TH FLOOR TORONTO, ONTARIO, M5H3Y2 CANADA
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2012-10-24
Status Date:
2019-04-08
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.