Brandinium

Trademark search for:

CINEPIX

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2012-12-06 — Application filed
  • 2012-12-10 — Application filed
  • 2012-12-18 — Application filed
  • 2012-12-19 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
  • 2012-12-27 — Teas voluntary amendment received
  • 2013-01-03 — Assigned to lie
  • 2013-01-08 — Preliminary/voluntary amendment - entered
  • 2013-03-24 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2013-03-30 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2013-03-30 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2013-03-30 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2013-04-02 — Office action issued
  • 2013-04-04 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2013-04-04 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2013-05-10 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2013-05-10 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2013-05-10 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2013-05-10 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2013-05-10 — Teas voluntary amendment received
  • 2013-05-17 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2013-05-17 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2013-05-17 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2013-05-18 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2013-06-05 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
  • 2013-06-25 — Published for opposition
  • 2013-06-25 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
  • 2013-07-25 — Extension of time to oppose received
  • 2013-11-08 — Extension of time to oppose process - terminated
  • 2013-12-31 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2014-06-10 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2014-06-10 — Sou extension 1 filed
  • 2014-07-01 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
  • 2014-07-07 — Sou extension 1 granted
  • 2014-07-08 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2014-12-31 — Sou extension 2 filed
  • 2015-01-21 — Sou extension received with teas petition
  • 2015-01-21 — Notice of revival - e-mailed
  • 2015-01-21 — Petition to revive-granted
  • 2015-01-21 — Sou extension 2 granted
  • 2015-01-21 — Teas petition to revive received
  • 2015-01-22 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2015-06-30 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2015-06-30 — Sou extension 3 filed
  • 2015-07-14 — Sou extension 3 granted
  • 2015-07-15 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2015-12-31 — Sou extension 4 filed
  • 2016-01-06 — Teas statement of use received
  • 2016-01-06 — Use amendment filed
  • 2016-01-06 — Sou extension received with teas petition
  • 2016-01-06 — Petition to revive-granted
  • 2016-01-06 — Teas petition to revive received
  • 2016-01-07 — Notice of revival - e-mailed
  • 2016-01-27 — Statement of use processing complete
  • 2016-01-27 — Sou extension 4 granted
  • 2016-01-28 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2016-02-17 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
  • 2016-02-18 — Notice of acceptance of statement of use e-mailed
  • 2016-03-22 — Registered-principal register
  • 2018-11-21 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2021-03-22 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
  • 2022-10-07 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
  • 2022-10-07 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

RADIOACTIVEGIANT, LLC
LOS ANGELES , CA
RadioactiveGiant Holdings, LLC
Santa Monica , CA
RadioactiveGiant Holdings, LLC
Santa Monica , CA
RadioactiveGiant Holdings, LLC
Santa Monica , CA

Correspondent

DAVID HOCHMAN WOLF, RIFKIN, SHAPIRO, SCHULMAN & RABKIN, LLP
11400 W OLYMPIC BLVD FL 9
LOS ANGELES, CA 90064-1582
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2012-12-06
Status Date:
2022-10-07
Filing Year:
2012

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.