Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2012 ›
DD ›
D.O.T. DEFENDER OF TEXEL
Trademark search for:
D.O.T. DEFENDER OF TEXEL
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2012-10-16 — Application filed
2012-10-19 — Application filed
2012-10-19 — Application filed
2012-10-20 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
2013-02-07 — Assigned to examiner
2013-02-13 — Approved for pub - principal register
2013-03-06 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2013-03-26 — Published for opposition
2013-03-26 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2013-04-17 — Extension of time to oppose received
2013-08-09 — Extension of time to oppose process - terminated
2013-09-24 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2013-11-15 — Teas statement of use received
2013-11-15 — Use amendment filed
2013-12-17 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2013-12-17 — Statement of use processing complete
2014-01-06 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
2014-01-26 — Assigned to lie
2014-01-27 — Law office registration review completed
2014-01-28 — Notice of acceptance of statement of use e-mailed
2014-03-04 — Registered-principal register
2017-06-01 — Cancellation instituted no. 999999
2017-09-09 — Cancellation granted no. 999999
2017-09-27 — Cancelled section 18-total
2017-09-27 — Final status recorded
2017-09-28 — Cancellation terminated no. 999999
Owner Information
DeNA Co., Ltd.
Tokyo JP
DeNA Co., Ltd.
Tokyo JP
DeNA Co., Ltd.
Tokyo JP
Correspondent
DENA CO LTD 2-21-1 SHIBUYA, SHIBUYA-KU TOKYO, 150-8510 JAPAN
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2012-10-16
Status Date:
2017-09-27
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.