Brandinium

Trademark search for:

DOBI.TV

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2012-08-08 — Application filed
  • 2012-08-11 — Application filed
  • 2012-08-15 — Application filed
  • 2012-12-05 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2012-12-06 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2012-12-06 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2012-12-06 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2012-12-20 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2012-12-20 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2013-01-02 — Office action issued
  • 2013-01-09 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2013-01-09 — Assigned to lie
  • 2013-01-09 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2013-01-28 — Suspension letter written
  • 2013-01-28 — Suspension letter written
  • 2013-01-28 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2013-01-28 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2013-01-28 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2013-01-28 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2013-08-01 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2013-08-19 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2013-08-19 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2013-08-19 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
  • 2014-02-19 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2014-02-27 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2014-02-27 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2014-03-06 — Suspension letter written
  • 2014-03-06 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2014-03-06 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2014-07-16 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2014-09-11 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2014-10-01 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2014-10-01 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2014-10-01 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
  • 2015-02-03 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2015-02-09 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2015-02-09 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2015-03-02 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2015-03-02 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2015-03-02 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2015-03-03 — Letter of protest evidence forwarded
  • 2015-03-05 — Letter of protest evidence reviewed-no further action taken
  • 2015-06-26 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2015-09-02 — Office action issued
  • 2015-09-09 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2015-09-09 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2015-09-30 — Data modification completed
  • 2015-09-30 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2015-09-30 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
  • 2015-10-01 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2015-10-03 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2015-10-20 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2015-10-20 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2015-10-21 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
  • 2015-11-10 — Published for opposition
  • 2015-11-10 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
  • 2015-11-20 — Extension of time to oppose received
  • 2016-03-07 — Opposition instituted no. 999999
  • 2016-04-06 — Application abandoned
  • 2016-04-06 — Application abandoned
  • 2016-04-06 — Opposition sustained no. 999999
  • 2016-04-06 — Opposition terminated no. 999999
  • 2016-04-06 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

IPLATEIA INC.
SEOUL KR
IPLATEIA INC.
SEOUL KR
IPLATEIA KOREA Ltd.
Seoul 135-010 KR

Correspondent

LEIGH ANN LINDQUIST SUGHRUE MION PLLC
2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NW
WASHINGTON, DC 20037-3213
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2012-08-08
Status Date:
2016-04-06
Filing Year:
2012

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.