Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2012 ›
EA ›
EASY TO PARTNER
Trademark search for:
EASY TO PARTNER
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2012-01-06 — Application filed
2012-05-17 — Sn assigned for sect 66a appl from ib
2012-05-18 — Application filed
2012-05-18 — Assigned to examiner
2012-05-19 — Final disposition recorded
2012-05-20 — Office action issued
2012-05-22 — Application filed
2012-05-23 — Office action issued
2012-05-23 — Office action issued
2012-06-11 — Office action issued
2012-12-19 — Application abandoned
2012-12-19 — Application abandoned
2013-01-15 — Fax received
2013-01-15 — Petition to revive-received
2013-02-12 — Assigned to petition staff
2013-02-14 — Reinstatement granted - response received
2013-02-15 — Notice of reinstatement mailed
2013-03-14 — Petition inquiry letter issued
2013-04-09 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2013-04-09 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2013-04-10 — Communication received from petitioner
2013-04-10 — Petition to revive-received
2013-07-26 — Assigned to petition staff
2013-07-29 — Fax received
2013-07-29 — Correspondence received in law office
2013-07-30 — Amendment from applicant entered
2013-07-30 — Amendment from applicant entered
2013-07-30 — Petition granted - response received
2013-07-30 — Notice of revival - e-mailed
2013-07-30 — Assigned to lie
2013-07-30 — Correspondence received in law office
2013-09-12 — Office action issued
2013-09-12 — Office action issued
2013-09-12 — Office action issued
2013-10-04 — Teas request for reconsideration received
2013-10-04 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2013-10-04 — Correspondence received in law office
2013-10-10 — Approved for pub - principal register
2013-10-17 — Law office publication review completed
2013-10-23 — Notification of possible opposition sent to ib
2013-10-23 — Notification of possible opposition created, to be sent to ib
2013-10-30 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2013-10-30 — Notice of start of opposition period created, to be sent to ib
2013-11-01 — Notification of possible opposition sent to ib
2013-11-13 — Notification of possible opposition - processed by ib
2013-11-19 — Published for opposition
2013-11-19 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2013-11-23 — Notification processed by ib
2014-02-04 — Registered-principal register
2014-05-04 — Final disposition recorded
2014-06-04 — Final disposition recorded
2014-06-04 — Final disposition recorded
2014-06-20 — Final disposition recorded
2019-02-04 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 71 (6-yr) e-mailed
2020-07-29 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2020-07-29 — Teas change of domestic representatives address
2020-07-29 — Teas change of owner address received
2020-07-29 — Teas change of correspondence received
2020-07-29 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2020-07-29 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2021-02-26 — Cancelled section 71
2021-10-26 — Total invalidation of reg ext protection created
2021-12-22 — Total invalidation of reg ext protection sent to ib
2021-12-22 — Invalidation processed
2022-01-06 — Final status recorded
2022-01-22 — Total invalidation processed by the ib
2022-07-31 — Death of international registration
2022-07-31 — Notification of effect of cancellation of intl reg e-mailed
Owner Information
Deutsche Telekom AG
Bonn DE
Deutsche Telekom AG
Bonn DE
Deutsche Telekom AG
Bonn DE
Correspondent
Ross Q. Panko ARENT FOX LLP 1717 K St., NW Washington, DC 20006 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2012-01-06
Status Date:
2022-01-06
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.