Brandinium

Trademark search for:

I-LINK CV

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2012-05-11 — Application filed
  • 2012-05-15 — Application filed
  • 2012-05-17 — Application filed
  • 2012-09-04 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2012-09-17 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2012-09-17 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2012-09-17 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2013-05-13 — Application abandoned
  • 2013-05-14 — Application abandoned
  • 2013-07-01 — Teas petition to revive received
  • 2013-07-01 — Petition to revive-granted
  • 2013-07-01 — Notice of revival - e-mailed
  • 2013-07-01 — Office action issued
  • 2013-07-02 — Assigned to lie
  • 2013-07-03 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2013-07-08 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2013-07-08 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2013-07-08 — Suspension letter written
  • 2013-07-08 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2013-07-08 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2014-01-08 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2014-01-08 — Suspension letter written
  • 2014-01-08 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2014-03-12 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2014-07-08 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2014-07-08 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2014-07-08 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
  • 2014-12-22 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2014-12-22 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2014-12-24 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2014-12-24 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2015-01-07 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2015-01-07 — Suspension letter written
  • 2015-01-07 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2015-04-29 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2015-04-29 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2015-05-05 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2015-05-05 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2015-05-05 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2015-05-08 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2015-05-27 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
  • 2015-06-16 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
  • 2015-06-16 — Published for opposition
  • 2015-09-01 — Registered-principal register
  • 2015-11-04 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2019-08-30 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2019-08-30 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2020-09-01 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
  • 2022-03-11 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
  • 2022-03-11 — Final status recorded
  • 2025-08-01 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2025-08-01 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2025-08-01 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2025-08-01 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2025-08-01 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2025-09-11 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2025-09-11 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2025-09-11 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2025-09-11 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2025-09-11 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed

Owner Information

IGT CANADA SOLUTIONS ULC
Halifax, Nova Scotia CA
GTECH CANADA ULC
MONCTON, NB CA
GTECH CANADA ULC
MONCTON, NB CA
GTECH CANADA ULC
MONCTON, NB CA
Spielo International Canada ULC
Moncton, New Brunswick CA

Correspondent

Steven Soucar IGT, In-House Counsel
9295 Prototype Drive
Reno, NV 89521
United States

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2012-05-11
Status Date:
2022-03-11
Category:
Electronics & Software
Filing Year:
2012

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.