Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2012 ›
MA ›
MAPART SYSTEMS
Trademark search for:
MAPART SYSTEMS
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2012-08-14 — Application filed
2012-08-17 — Application filed
2012-08-23 — Application filed
2012-12-10 — Assigned to examiner
2012-12-17 — Final disposition recorded
2012-12-17 — Final disposition recorded
2012-12-17 — Final disposition recorded
2013-06-17 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2013-06-17 — Office action issued
2013-06-17 — Correspondence received in law office
2013-07-24 — Office action issued
2013-07-24 — Office action issued
2013-07-24 — Office action issued
2014-01-15 — Teas amendment of use received
2014-01-15 — Teas request for reconsideration received
2014-01-16 — Amendment to use processing complete
2014-01-16 — Use amendment filed
2014-01-23 — Use amendment accepted
2014-01-23 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2014-01-23 — Correspondence received in law office
2014-01-24 — Notice of acceptance of amendment to allege use e-mailed
2014-10-20 — Final disposition recorded
2014-10-20 — Final disposition recorded
2014-10-20 — Final disposition recorded
2015-04-17 — Teas change of correspondence received
2015-05-29 — Application abandoned
2015-05-29 — Application abandoned
2015-05-29 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Second Site LLC
Chattanooga , TN
Correspondent
STEPHEN J. STARK Miller & Martin PLLC 832 Georgia Avenue Suite 1200 Volunteer Building Chattanooga, TN 37402-2289
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2012-08-14
Status Date:
2015-05-29
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.