Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2012 ›
ON ›
ONTRAAC
Trademark search for:
ONTRAAC
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2012-07-20 — Application filed
2012-07-24 — Application filed
2012-07-27 — Application filed
2012-07-28 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
2012-11-14 — Assigned to examiner
2012-11-18 — Final disposition recorded
2012-11-18 — Final disposition recorded
2012-11-18 — Final disposition recorded
2013-05-15 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2013-05-15 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2013-05-17 — Office action issued
2013-05-17 — Correspondence received in law office
2013-05-18 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2013-06-05 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2013-06-05 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2013-06-10 — Suspension letter written
2013-06-10 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2013-06-10 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2013-12-27 — Assigned to lie
2013-12-30 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2014-01-22 — Suspension inquiry written
2014-01-22 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2014-01-22 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
2014-06-05 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2014-06-13 — Suspension letter written
2014-06-13 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2014-06-13 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2014-06-13 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2014-06-13 — Correspondence received in law office
2014-10-16 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2014-10-23 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2014-10-23 — Correspondence received in law office
2014-11-17 — Suspension letter written
2014-11-17 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2014-11-17 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2015-05-28 — Suspension inquiry written
2015-05-28 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2015-05-28 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
2015-11-12 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2015-11-12 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2015-11-16 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2015-11-23 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2015-11-23 — Correspondence received in law office
2015-11-24 — Suspension letter written
2015-11-24 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2015-11-24 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2016-05-25 — Suspension inquiry written
2016-05-25 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2016-05-25 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
2016-07-21 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2016-07-28 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2016-07-28 — Correspondence received in law office
2016-07-29 — Suspension letter written
2016-07-29 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2016-07-29 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2017-02-13 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2017-02-13 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2017-02-13 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2017-03-09 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2017-03-09 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2017-03-11 — Suspension inquiry written
2017-03-11 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2017-03-11 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
2017-09-11 — Application abandoned
2017-09-12 — Application abandoned
2017-09-12 — Application abandoned
2017-09-12 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Toronto, Ontario CA
Correspondent
Tricia L. Schulz Foley & Lardner LLP 150 E. Gilman Street, Suite 5000 Madison, WI 53703-1482 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2012-07-20
Status Date:
2017-09-12
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.