Brandinium

Trademark search for:

PKARMA

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2012-06-27 — Application filed
  • 2012-06-30 — Application filed
  • 2012-07-03 — Teas amendment of use received
  • 2012-07-05 — Application filed
  • 2012-07-06 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
  • 2012-07-13 — Assigned to lie
  • 2012-07-17 — Amendment to use processing complete
  • 2012-07-17 — Use amendment filed
  • 2012-09-27 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2012-09-28 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2012-09-28 — Use amendment accepted
  • 2012-09-28 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2012-09-28 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2012-09-29 — Notice of acceptance of amendment to allege use e-mailed
  • 2013-01-24 — Office action issued
  • 2013-02-01 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2013-02-01 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2013-02-04 — Office action issued
  • 2013-02-04 — Office action issued
  • 2013-02-04 — Office action issued
  • 2013-02-05 — Teas request for reconsideration received
  • 2013-02-05 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2013-02-05 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2013-02-22 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2013-02-22 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2013-02-22 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2013-02-28 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2013-02-28 — Office action issued
  • 2013-02-28 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2013-03-17 — Office action issued
  • 2013-03-17 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2013-03-17 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2013-03-19 — Teas request for reconsideration received
  • 2013-03-19 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2013-03-19 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2013-04-10 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2013-04-10 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2013-04-10 — Office action issued
  • 2013-04-17 — Teas request for reconsideration received
  • 2013-04-17 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2013-04-17 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2013-04-24 — Teas request for reconsideration received
  • 2013-05-02 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2013-05-02 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2013-05-21 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2013-05-21 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2013-05-21 — Office action issued
  • 2013-06-10 — Teas request for reconsideration received
  • 2013-06-10 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2013-06-10 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2013-06-18 — Teas request for reconsideration received
  • 2013-06-22 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2013-06-22 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2013-06-26 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2013-06-26 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2013-06-26 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2013-06-26 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2013-06-26 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2013-07-01 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2013-07-17 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
  • 2013-08-06 — Published for opposition
  • 2013-08-06 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
  • 2013-10-22 — Registered-principal register
  • 2018-10-22 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
  • 2020-06-05 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
  • 2020-06-05 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

POSITIVE KARMA INC
LAS VEGS , NV
POSITIVE KARMA INC
LAS VEGS , NV
POSITIVE KARMA INC
LAS VEGS , NV

Correspondent

POSITIVE KARMA INC POSITIVE KARMA INC
3712 RICK STRATTON DR
LAS VEGAS, NV 89120-2647
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2012-06-27
Status Date:
2020-06-05
Filing Year:
2012

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.