Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2012 ›
PR ›
PROPIT
Trademark search for:
PROPIT
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2012-05-16 — Application filed
2012-05-19 — Application filed
2012-05-22 — Application filed
2012-05-23 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
2012-09-07 — Assigned to examiner
2012-09-12 — Final disposition recorded
2012-09-12 — Final disposition recorded
2012-09-12 — Final disposition recorded
2013-02-25 — Office action issued
2013-02-26 — Assigned to lie
2013-02-28 — Approved for pub - principal register
2013-02-28 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2013-02-28 — Correspondence received in law office
2013-03-01 — Law office publication review completed
2013-03-20 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2013-04-09 — Published for opposition
2013-04-09 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2013-06-04 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2013-07-05 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2013-07-05 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2013-12-04 — Sou teas extension received
2013-12-04 — Sou extension 1 filed
2013-12-04 — Sou extension 1 granted
2013-12-06 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2014-07-07 — Application abandoned
2014-07-07 — Application abandoned
2014-07-07 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Propit Online Games Inc.
Hamilton, Ontario CA
Propit Online Games Inc.
Hamilton, Ontario CA
Correspondent
Arthur J. DeBaugh Bell, Davis & Pitt, P.A. 100 N. Cherry Street Suite 600 Winston-Salem, NC 27101
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2012-05-16
Status Date:
2014-07-07
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.