Brandinium

Trademark search for:

Q.E. IN A BOX

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2012-04-06 — Application filed
  • 2012-04-10 — Application filed
  • 2012-04-16 — Application filed
  • 2012-07-20 — Suspension letter written
  • 2012-07-20 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2012-07-20 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2012-07-20 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2013-01-02 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2013-01-02 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2013-01-02 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2013-01-03 — Suspension letter written
  • 2013-01-03 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2013-01-03 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2013-07-03 — Assigned to lie
  • 2013-07-05 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2013-07-08 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2013-07-08 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2013-07-08 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
  • 2013-11-26 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2013-12-02 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2013-12-02 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2013-12-03 — Suspension letter written
  • 2013-12-03 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2013-12-03 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2014-06-05 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2014-06-06 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2014-06-06 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2014-06-06 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
  • 2014-12-04 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2014-12-10 — Suspension letter written
  • 2014-12-10 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2014-12-10 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2014-12-10 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2014-12-10 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2015-06-18 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2015-06-18 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2015-06-18 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
  • 2015-06-18 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2015-10-23 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2015-10-23 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2015-10-23 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2015-10-23 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2015-12-04 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2015-12-04 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2015-12-04 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2015-12-10 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2015-12-10 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2015-12-11 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2015-12-14 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2015-12-30 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
  • 2016-01-19 — Published for opposition
  • 2016-01-19 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
  • 2016-03-15 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2016-03-18 — 1(b) basis deleted; proceed to registration
  • 2016-03-18 — Notice of allowance cancelled
  • 2016-04-26 — Registered-principal register
  • 2021-04-26 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
  • 2022-11-11 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
  • 2022-11-11 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Phoenix Quality Inspections Inc.
OSHAWA, ONTARIO CA
Phoenix Quality Inspections Inc.
OSHAWA, ONTARIO CA
Phoenix Quality Inspections Inc.
OSHAWA, ONTARIO CA

Correspondent

Anessa Owen Kramer Honigman Miller Schwartz & Cohn LLP
39400 Woodward Avenue
Suite 101
Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2012-04-06
Status Date:
2022-11-11
Filing Year:
2012

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.