Trademark search for:

RDMIGO

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2012-11-15 — Application filed
2012-11-26 — Application filed
2012-11-27 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
2013-03-11 — Final disposition recorded
2013-03-11 — Final disposition recorded
2013-03-11 — Assigned to examiner
2013-03-11 — Final disposition recorded
2013-09-11 — Office action issued
2013-09-18 — Assigned to lie
2013-09-26 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2013-09-26 — Correspondence received in law office
2013-09-30 — Assigned to examiner
2013-10-03 — Approved for pub - principal register
2013-10-04 — Law office publication review completed
2013-10-23 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2013-11-12 — Published for opposition
2013-11-12 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2014-01-28 — Registered-principal register
2019-01-28 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
2020-01-28 — Teas section 8 & 15 received
2020-03-24 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
2020-03-24 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
2020-03-24 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 & 15 - e-mailed
2023-01-28 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
2024-08-09 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2024-08-09 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

TMB, Inc
Pacoima , CA

TMB, Inc
Pacoima , CA

TMB, Inc
Pacoima , CA

Correspondent

SCOTT C HARRIS LAW OFFICE OF SCOTT C HARRIS, INC
PO BOX 1389
RANCHO SANTA FE, CA 92067-1389
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2012-11-15

Status Date:
2024-08-09

Category:
Electronics & Software

Filing Year:
2012

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.