Trademark search for:

BROOKLYN HEADPHONE COMPANY

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2013-11-26 — Application filed
2013-11-29 — Application filed
2013-12-11 — Application filed
2014-02-14 — Assigned to examiner
2014-02-15 — Final disposition recorded
2014-02-15 — Final disposition recorded
2014-02-15 — Final disposition recorded
2014-09-13 — Application abandoned
2014-09-15 — Application abandoned
2014-09-30 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2014-09-30 — Office action issued
2014-09-30 — Notice of revival - e-mailed
2014-09-30 — Petition to revive-granted
2014-09-30 — Correspondence received in law office
2014-09-30 — Teas petition to revive received
2014-10-01 — Notice of revival - mailed
2014-10-03 — Teas amendment of use received
2014-10-04 — Amendment to use processing complete
2014-10-04 — Use amendment filed
2014-10-07 — Approved for registration supplemental register
2014-10-07 — Use amendment accepted
2014-10-08 — Notice of acceptance of amendment to allege use e-mailed
2014-10-09 — Notice of acceptance of amendment to allege use mailed
2014-10-27 — Assigned to lie
2014-10-27 — Law office publication review completed
2014-12-02 — Registered-supplemental register
2019-12-02 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
2021-07-09 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2021-07-09 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

ERG NY, LLC
Carteret , NJ

ERG NY, LLC
Carteret , NJ

Correspondent

URI DALLAL
PO BOX 340256
BROOKLYN, NY 11234-0256
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2013-11-26

Status Date:
2021-07-09

Category:
Electronics & Software

Filing Year:
2013

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.