Brandinium

Trademark search for:

PILOT ELECTRONICS

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2013-03-07 — Application filed
  • 2013-03-11 — Application filed
  • 2013-03-12 — Application filed
  • 2013-06-19 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2013-06-19 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2013-06-19 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2013-06-19 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2013-12-18 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2013-12-18 — Office action issued
  • 2013-12-18 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2013-12-19 — Suspension letter written
  • 2013-12-19 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2013-12-19 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2014-06-20 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2014-12-30 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2015-01-20 — Assigned to lie
  • 2015-01-20 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2015-02-04 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
  • 2015-02-24 — Published for opposition
  • 2015-02-24 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
  • 2015-03-04 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2015-03-04 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2015-04-21 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2015-06-10 — Teas statement of use received
  • 2015-06-10 — Use amendment filed
  • 2015-06-24 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
  • 2015-07-10 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
  • 2015-07-13 — Statement of use processing complete
  • 2015-07-14 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2015-07-14 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2015-07-14 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2015-08-26 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2016-01-12 — Office action issued
  • 2016-01-13 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2016-01-13 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2016-01-14 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
  • 2016-01-15 — Notice of acceptance of statement of use e-mailed
  • 2016-02-16 — Registered-principal register
  • 2016-09-20 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2016-09-20 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2017-04-24 — Teas section 7 request received
  • 2017-06-06 — Teas withdrawal of attorney received
  • 2017-06-06 — Withdrawal of attorney granted
  • 2017-06-26 — Assigned to paralegal
  • 2017-07-05 — Application abandoned
  • 2017-08-10 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2017-08-10 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2018-12-06 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2018-12-06 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2019-03-22 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2019-03-22 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2020-01-29 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2020-01-29 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2021-02-16 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
  • 2021-10-14 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2021-10-14 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2021-10-14 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2022-08-26 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
  • 2022-08-26 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

PILOT, INC.
CITY OF INDUSTRY , CA
PILOT, INC.
CITY OF INDUSTRY , CA
Pilot Automotive, Inc.
city of industry , CA
Pilot Automotive, Inc.
city of industry , CA

Correspondent

Pamela N. Hirschman Sheridan Ross P.C.
1560 Broadway, Suite 1200
Denver, CO 80202
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2013-03-07
Status Date:
2022-08-26
Filing Year:
2013

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.