Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2013 ›
ST ›
STARS OF EGYPT
Trademark search for:
STARS OF EGYPT
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2013-11-21 — Application filed
2013-11-25 — Application filed
2013-12-05 — Application filed
2014-02-13 — Suspension letter written
2014-02-13 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2014-02-13 — Assigned to examiner
2014-02-13 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2014-03-12 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
2014-08-13 — Assigned to lie
2014-08-18 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2014-09-08 — Suspension inquiry written
2014-09-08 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2014-09-08 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
2015-04-17 — Application abandoned
2015-04-20 — Application abandoned
2015-05-01 — Teas change of correspondence received
2015-05-01 — Office action issued
2015-05-01 — Notice of revival - e-mailed
2015-05-01 — Petition to revive-granted
2015-05-01 — Teas petition to revive received
2015-05-07 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2015-05-07 — Notice of revival - mailed
2015-05-07 — Correspondence received in law office
2015-05-26 — Suspension letter written
2015-05-26 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2015-05-26 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2015-11-04 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
2015-11-30 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2015-12-21 — Suspension inquiry written
2015-12-21 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2015-12-21 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
2016-05-18 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2016-05-18 — Teas change of correspondence received
2016-05-31 — Assigned to lie
2016-06-02 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2016-06-02 — Correspondence received in law office
2016-06-15 — Suspension letter written
2016-06-15 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2016-06-15 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2016-12-15 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2017-01-05 — Suspension inquiry written
2017-01-05 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2017-01-05 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
2017-06-16 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2017-06-16 — Teas change of correspondence received
2017-07-10 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2017-07-10 — Correspondence received in law office
2017-07-24 — Suspension letter written
2017-07-24 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2017-07-24 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2018-01-25 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2018-02-13 — Suspension inquiry written
2018-02-13 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2018-02-13 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
2018-07-19 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2018-07-20 — Assigned to lie
2018-07-24 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2018-07-24 — Correspondence received in law office
2018-07-26 — Suspension letter written
2018-07-26 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2018-07-26 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2019-02-04 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2019-02-26 — Suspension inquiry written
2019-02-26 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2019-02-26 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
2019-08-13 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2019-08-13 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2019-09-27 — Application abandoned
2019-09-27 — Application abandoned
2019-09-27 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
IGT CANADA SOLUTIONS ULC
GTECH CANADA ULC
Spielo International Canada ULC
Correspondent
COLLEEN CAISSIE-DUPUIS
Filing Details
Filing Date:
Status Date:
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.
