Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2014 ›
AZ ›
AZURIT
Trademark search for:
AZURIT
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2014-04-15 — Application filed
2014-06-26 — Sn assigned for sect 66a appl from ib
2014-06-27 — Application filed
2014-07-01 — Application filed
2014-07-25 — Assigned to examiner
2014-08-04 — Final disposition recorded
2014-08-05 — Office action issued
2014-08-06 — Office action issued
2014-09-04 — Final disposition recorded
2014-09-05 — Office action issued
2014-09-08 — Office action issued
2014-09-08 — Office action issued
2014-09-25 — Office action issued
2015-02-24 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2015-02-24 — Teas change of correspondence received
2015-02-24 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2015-03-09 — Office action issued
2015-03-09 — Correspondence received in law office
2015-03-10 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2015-05-07 — Final disposition recorded
2015-05-07 — Final disposition recorded
2015-05-07 — Final disposition recorded
2015-08-14 — Teas change of correspondence received
2015-11-05 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2015-11-05 — Office action issued
2015-11-05 — Correspondence received in law office
2015-12-02 — Notification of possible opposition sent to ib
2015-12-02 — Notification of possible opposition created, to be sent to ib
2015-12-04 — Final disposition recorded
2015-12-04 — Final disposition recorded
2015-12-04 — Final disposition recorded
2015-12-18 — Notification of possible opposition - processed by ib
2016-03-16 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2016-03-16 — Office action issued
2016-03-16 — Correspondence received in law office
2016-04-28 — Priority action written
2016-04-28 — Priority action e-mailed
2016-04-28 — Notification of priority action e-mailed
2016-10-28 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2016-10-28 — Office action issued
2016-10-28 — Correspondence received in law office
2017-01-10 — Approved for pub - principal register
2017-02-01 — Notification of possible opposition sent to ib
2017-02-01 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2017-02-01 — Notice of start of opposition period created, to be sent to ib
2017-02-21 — Published for opposition
2017-02-21 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2017-05-09 — Registered-principal register
2017-08-09 — Final disposition recorded
2017-08-11 — Final disposition recorded
2017-08-11 — Final disposition recorded
2017-09-22 — Final disposition recorded
2017-10-06 — Notification processed by ib
2020-01-02 — New representative at ib received
2022-05-09 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 71 (6-yr) e-mailed
2022-08-05 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2022-08-05 — Teas change of owner address received
2022-08-05 — Teas change of correspondence received
2022-08-05 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2022-08-05 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2023-11-24 — Cancelled section 71
2024-04-16 — Final status recorded
2024-07-25 — Total invalidation of reg ext protection created
2024-08-05 — Total invalidation of reg ext protection sent to ib
2024-08-05 — Invalidation processed
2024-10-26 — Total invalidation processed by the ib
2024-11-01 — Death of international registration
2024-11-01 — Notification of effect of cancellation of intl reg e-mailed
Owner Information
Lemken GmbH & Co. KG
DE
Lemken GmbH & Co. KG
DE
Lemken GmbH & Co. KG
DE
Correspondent
James C. Wray Cermak Nakajima & McGowan LLP 2000 Duke Street, Suite 300 Alexandria, VA 22314 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2014-04-15
Status Date:
2024-04-16
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.