Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2014 ›
BW ›
BWH KOFFER
Trademark search for:
BWH KOFFER
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2014-05-16 — Application filed
2014-05-20 — Application filed
2014-05-30 — Application filed
2014-05-31 — Notice of design search code mailed
2014-09-02 — Final disposition recorded
2014-09-02 — Assigned to examiner
2014-09-03 — Final disposition recorded
2015-02-27 — Office action issued
2015-03-09 — Assigned to lie
2015-03-11 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2015-03-11 — Correspondence received in law office
2015-03-31 — Examiners amendment mailed
2015-03-31 — Examiners amendment -written
2015-03-31 — Examiner's amendment entered
2015-04-01 — Approved for pub - principal register
2015-04-08 — Law office publication review completed
2015-04-22 — Notice of publication
2015-05-12 — Published for opposition
2015-07-07 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2015-07-10 — Teas delete 1(b) basis received
2015-07-10 — Notice of allowance cancelled
2015-08-18 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2015-08-18 — 1(b) basis deleted; proceed to registration
2015-09-22 — Registered-principal register
2022-04-01 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2022-04-01 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Wriedt Vermögensverwaltung GmbH & Co.KG
Hörstel-Bevergern DE
Wriedt Vermögensverwaltung GmbH & Co.KG
Hörstel-Bevergern DE
Wriedt Vermögensverwaltung GmbH & Co.KG
Hörstel-Bevergern DE
Correspondent
STEWART J BELLUS COLLARD & ROE 1077 NORTHERN BLVD ROSLYN, NY 11576-1614 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2014-05-16
Status Date:
2022-04-01
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.