Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2014 ›
ES ›
ESYMPHONY
Trademark search for:
ESYMPHONY
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2014-09-17 — Application filed
2014-09-20 — Application filed
2014-09-24 — Application filed
2014-09-25 — Notice of pseudo mark e-mailed
2014-12-31 — Assigned to examiner
2015-01-08 — Final disposition recorded
2015-01-08 — Final disposition recorded
2015-01-08 — Final disposition recorded
2015-05-18 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2015-05-18 — Office action issued
2015-05-18 — Correspondence received in law office
2015-06-02 — Approved for pub - principal register
2015-06-19 — Assigned to lie
2015-06-26 — Assigned to lie
2015-06-27 — Law office publication review completed
2015-07-15 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2015-08-04 — Published for opposition
2015-08-04 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2015-09-29 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2016-01-19 — Sou teas extension received
2016-01-19 — Teas change of correspondence received
2016-01-19 — Sou extension 1 filed
2016-01-19 — Sou extension 1 granted
2016-01-21 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2016-10-31 — Application abandoned
2016-10-31 — Application abandoned
2016-10-31 — Final status recorded
2017-08-10 — Teas change of correspondence received
Owner Information
Palla, Jitender
East Rutherford , NJ
Palla, Jitender
East Rutherford , NJ
Correspondent
RAJ ABHYANKER LegalForce RAPC Worldwide, P.C. 446 E Southern Ave Tempe, AZ 85282 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2014-09-17
Status Date:
2016-10-31
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.