Brandinium

Trademark search for:

JAJINGLE

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2014-09-05 — Application filed
  • 2014-09-09 — Application filed
  • 2014-09-16 — Application filed
  • 2014-12-17 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2014-12-19 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2014-12-19 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2014-12-19 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2015-06-19 — Office action issued
  • 2015-07-01 — Assigned to lie
  • 2015-07-08 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2015-07-08 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2015-07-21 — Suspension letter written
  • 2015-07-21 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2015-07-21 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2016-01-21 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2016-02-02 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2016-02-02 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2016-02-02 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
  • 2016-02-03 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2016-02-04 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2016-02-04 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2016-02-08 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2016-02-11 — Suspension letter written
  • 2016-02-11 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2016-02-11 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2016-08-15 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2016-08-31 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2016-08-31 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2016-08-31 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
  • 2016-09-02 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2016-09-09 — Assigned to lie
  • 2016-09-16 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2016-09-16 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2016-10-11 — Suspension letter written
  • 2016-10-11 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2016-10-11 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2017-04-24 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2017-05-04 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2017-05-04 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2017-05-04 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2017-05-04 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
  • 2017-05-12 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2017-05-12 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2017-05-15 — Suspension letter written
  • 2017-05-15 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2017-05-15 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2017-11-20 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2017-12-08 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2017-12-08 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2017-12-08 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
  • 2018-01-15 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2018-01-19 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2018-01-19 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2018-02-06 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2018-02-21 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
  • 2018-03-13 — Published for opposition
  • 2018-03-13 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
  • 2018-03-29 — Extension of time to oppose received
  • 2018-05-13 — Opposition instituted no. 999999
  • 2018-08-20 — Application abandoned
  • 2018-08-20 — Opposition sustained no. 999999
  • 2018-08-20 — Opposition terminated no. 999999
  • 2018-08-20 — Final status recorded
  • 2018-09-07 — Application abandoned

Owner Information

1312688 Ontario Inc.
Shannonville, Ontario CA
1312688 Ontario Inc.
Shannonville, Ontario CA

Correspondent

L S VANLANDINGHAM III
91 LAKEMASTER LANE
LAKE HAVASU CITY, AZ 86403
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2014-09-05
Status Date:
2018-08-20
Filing Year:
2014

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.