Brandinium

Trademark search for:

LEOMAX

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2014-07-31 — Application filed
  • 2015-01-29 — Sn assigned for sect 66a appl from ib
  • 2015-01-30 — Application filed
  • 2015-01-30 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2015-02-03 — Application filed
  • 2015-02-04 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2015-02-05 — Office action issued
  • 2015-02-06 — Office action issued
  • 2015-02-06 — Office action issued
  • 2015-02-27 — Office action issued
  • 2015-07-24 — Office action issued
  • 2015-07-24 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2015-07-25 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2015-08-05 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2015-08-05 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2015-08-05 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2015-08-05 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2015-08-07 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2015-08-07 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2015-08-07 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2015-08-07 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2015-08-07 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2015-08-25 — Assigned to lie
  • 2015-08-31 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2015-09-16 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
  • 2015-09-16 — Notice of start of opposition period created, to be sent to ib
  • 2015-09-16 — Notification of possible opposition sent to ib
  • 2015-10-02 — Notification processed by ib
  • 2015-10-06 — Published for opposition
  • 2015-10-06 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
  • 2015-11-05 — Extension of time to oppose received
  • 2016-01-02 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2016-04-19 — Extension of time to oppose process - terminated
  • 2016-05-24 — Registered-principal register
  • 2016-08-24 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2016-08-24 — Generic madrid transaction created
  • 2016-08-24 — Generic madrid transaction sent to ib
  • 2017-05-05 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2019-03-29 — Limitation of goods received from ib
  • 2019-10-17 — Correction under section 7 - processed
  • 2019-10-17 — Limitation from the ib examined and entered
  • 2020-06-17 — Partial invalidation of reg ext protection created
  • 2020-07-06 — Invalidation reviewed - no action required by office
  • 2021-03-24 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2021-03-24 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2021-03-24 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2021-03-24 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2021-03-24 — Teas withdrawal of attorney received-firm retains
  • 2021-03-24 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2021-05-24 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 71 (6-yr) e-mailed
  • 2022-12-09 — Cancelled section 71
  • 2023-08-09 — Total invalidation of reg ext protection created
  • 2023-09-06 — Generic madrid transaction created
  • 2023-09-06 — Generic madrid transaction sent to ib
  • 2023-10-02 — Total invalidation processed by the ib
  • 2024-07-31 — Final status recorded
  • 2025-02-21 — Death of international registration
  • 2025-02-21 — Notification of effect of cancellation of intl reg e-mailed

Owner Information

Obschestvo s ogranichennoi otvetstvennostyu; "Domashniy Magazin"
RU-115088 Moscow RU
Obschestvo s ogranichennoi otvetstvennostyu; "Domashniy Magazin"
RU
Obschestvo s ogranichennoi otvetstvennostyu; "Domashniy Magazin"
RU

Correspondent

Nicholas D. Wells OBSCHESTVO S OGRANICHENNOY OTVETSTVENNO STYU
330 Main St
Kaysville, UT 84037
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2014-07-31
Status Date:
2024-07-31
Filing Year:
2014

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.