Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2014 ›
RE ›
RELATIONSHIP FORENSICS
Trademark search for:
RELATIONSHIP FORENSICS
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2014-03-26 — Application filed
2014-03-29 — Application filed
2014-04-08 — Application filed
2014-06-27 — Assigned to examiner
2014-07-03 — Final disposition recorded
2014-07-03 — Final disposition recorded
2014-07-03 — Final disposition recorded
2015-01-05 — Office action issued
2015-01-05 — Correspondence received in law office
2015-01-06 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2015-01-27 — Final disposition recorded
2015-01-27 — Final disposition recorded
2015-01-27 — Final disposition recorded
2015-07-27 — Office action issued
2015-07-27 — Correspondence received in law office
2015-07-28 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2015-08-14 — Office action issued
2015-08-14 — Office action issued
2015-08-14 — Office action issued
2016-01-24 — Teas request for reconsideration received
2016-02-01 — Assigned to lie
2016-02-04 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2016-02-04 — Correspondence received in law office
2016-03-01 — Final disposition recorded
2016-03-01 — Final disposition recorded
2016-03-01 — Final disposition recorded
2016-09-27 — Application abandoned
2016-09-27 — Application abandoned
2016-09-27 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Catelas Inc.
Wellesley , MA
Correspondent
THOMAS F. DUNN MORSE, BARNES-BROWN & PENDLETON, P.C. 230 3RD AVE STE 4 WALTHAM, MA 02451-7542 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2014-03-26
Status Date:
2016-09-27
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.