Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2015 ›
BE ›
BEGAZE
Trademark search for:
BEGAZE
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2015-01-27 — Application filed
2015-08-20 — Sn assigned for sect 66a appl from ib
2015-08-21 — Application filed
2015-08-21 — Assigned to examiner
2015-08-25 — Application filed
2015-08-26 — Final disposition recorded
2015-08-27 — Office action issued
2015-08-27 — Office action issued
2015-08-27 — Office action issued
2015-09-19 — Office action issued
2016-02-17 — Office action issued
2016-02-23 — Assigned to lie
2016-02-23 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2016-02-23 — Correspondence received in law office
2016-03-14 — Office action issued
2016-03-14 — Office action issued
2016-03-14 — Office action issued
2016-08-15 — Teas request for reconsideration received
2016-08-15 — Correspondence received in law office
2016-08-18 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2016-09-07 — Action req for recon denied no appeal filed counted not mailed
2016-09-07 — Notification for req for recon denied no appeal filed
2016-09-07 — Action for req for recon denied no appeal filed e-mailed
2016-09-14 — Teas request for reconsideration received
2016-09-14 — Exparte appeal received at ttab
2016-09-14 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
2016-09-14 — Ex parte appeal-instituted
2016-09-27 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2016-09-27 — Correspondence received in law office
2016-10-05 — Examiners amendment -written
2016-10-05 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
2016-10-05 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2016-10-05 — Examiner's amendment entered
2016-10-24 — Approved for pub - principal register
2016-10-24 — Exparte appeal terminated
2016-10-28 — Assigned to lie
2016-11-02 — Law office publication review completed
2016-11-16 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2016-11-16 — Notice of start of opposition period created, to be sent to ib
2016-11-16 — Notification of possible opposition sent to ib
2016-12-06 — Published for opposition
2016-12-06 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2017-01-25 — Notification of possible opposition created, to be sent to ib
2017-01-25 — Notification of possible opposition sent to ib
2017-02-10 — Notification of possible opposition - processed by ib
2017-02-21 — Registered-principal register
2017-05-21 — Final disposition recorded
2017-07-13 — Generic madrid transaction created
2017-07-13 — Generic madrid transaction sent to ib
2017-08-11 — Notification processed by ib
2017-10-20 — Final disposition recorded
2018-04-17 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2018-04-17 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2018-06-01 — New representative at ib received
2022-02-21 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 71 (6-yr) e-mailed
2023-09-08 — Cancelled section 71
2024-01-27 — New representative at ib received
2024-05-08 — Total invalidation of reg ext protection created
2024-05-15 — Generic madrid transaction created
2024-05-15 — Generic madrid transaction sent to ib
2024-06-17 — Total invalidation processed by the ib
2025-01-27 — Final status recorded
2025-08-22 — Death of international registration
2025-08-22 — Notification of effect of cancellation of intl reg e-mailed
Owner Information
SensoMotoric Instruments Gesellschaft für innovative Sensorik mbH
DE
SensoMotoric Instruments Gesellschaft für innovative Sensorik mbH
DE
SensoMotoric Instruments Gesellschaft für innovative Sensorik mbH
DE
Correspondent
Thomas R. La Perle Apple Inc. One Apple Park Way Cupertino, CA 95014 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2015-01-27
Status Date:
2025-01-27
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.