Brandinium

Trademark search for:

BEING INDIAN

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2015-04-02 — Application filed
  • 2015-04-06 — Application filed
  • 2015-04-13 — Application filed
  • 2015-04-14 — Notice of design search code e-mailed
  • 2015-05-04 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2015-05-08 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2015-05-08 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2015-05-08 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2015-10-10 — Office action issued
  • 2015-10-10 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2015-10-10 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2015-10-11 — Suspension letter written
  • 2015-10-11 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2015-10-11 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2015-10-22 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2015-10-22 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2015-10-22 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2015-10-23 — Suspension letter written
  • 2015-10-23 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2015-10-23 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2016-04-26 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2016-04-26 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
  • 2016-04-26 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2016-05-03 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2016-05-13 — Assigned to lie
  • 2016-05-17 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2016-05-17 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2016-05-18 — Suspension letter written
  • 2016-05-18 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2016-05-18 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2016-11-18 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2016-11-21 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2016-11-21 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
  • 2016-11-21 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2016-12-21 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2016-12-23 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2016-12-23 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2016-12-23 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2016-12-23 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2016-12-23 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2017-01-15 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2017-01-15 — Office action issued
  • 2017-01-15 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2017-01-15 — Divisional request received
  • 2017-01-15 — Teas request to divide received
  • 2017-01-16 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2017-01-17 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
  • 2017-01-19 — Divisional processing complete
  • 2017-01-20 — Notice of design search code e-mailed
  • 2017-01-21 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2017-02-03 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2017-02-22 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
  • 2017-03-14 — Published for opposition
  • 2017-03-14 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
  • 2017-05-09 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2017-05-10 — Teas post publication amendment received
  • 2017-05-10 — Notice of allowance cancelled
  • 2017-06-09 — 1(b) basis deleted; proceed to registration
  • 2017-07-18 — Registered-principal register
  • 2017-10-02 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2022-07-18 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
  • 2024-02-02 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
  • 2024-02-02 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

The Aleph Group Pte Limited
Grand Building SG
The Aleph Group Pte Limited
Grand Building SG
The Aleph Group Pte Limited
Grand Building SG

Correspondent

MARIANA P. NOLI NOLI IP Solutions PC
5030 Bella Collina Street
Oceanside, CA 92056
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2015-04-02
Status Date:
2024-02-02
Filing Year:
2015

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.