Brandinium

Trademark search for:

COGNITIVE VENDING

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2015-06-11 — Application filed
  • 2015-06-15 — Application filed
  • 2015-06-15 — Application filed
  • 2015-09-21 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2015-09-22 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2015-09-22 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2015-09-22 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2016-01-15 — Office action issued
  • 2016-01-15 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2016-01-16 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2016-02-08 — Office action issued
  • 2016-02-08 — Office action issued
  • 2016-02-08 — Office action issued
  • 2016-02-17 — Teas request for reconsideration received
  • 2016-02-17 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2016-02-18 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2016-02-24 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2016-03-16 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
  • 2016-04-05 — Published for opposition
  • 2016-04-05 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
  • 2016-05-31 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2016-11-30 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2016-11-30 — Sou extension 1 filed
  • 2016-11-30 — Sou extension 1 granted
  • 2016-12-02 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2017-05-31 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2017-05-31 — Sou extension 2 filed
  • 2017-05-31 — Sou extension 2 granted
  • 2017-06-02 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2017-11-13 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2017-11-13 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2017-11-13 — Sou extension 3 filed
  • 2017-11-13 — Sou extension 3 granted
  • 2017-11-15 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2018-03-20 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2018-05-02 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2018-05-02 — Sou extension 4 filed
  • 2018-05-02 — Sou extension 4 granted
  • 2018-05-04 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2018-08-30 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2018-08-30 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2018-10-26 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2018-10-26 — Sou extension 5 filed
  • 2018-11-02 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
  • 2018-11-02 — Sou extension 5 granted
  • 2018-11-03 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2019-05-30 — Teas statement of use received
  • 2019-05-30 — Use amendment filed
  • 2019-06-01 — Statement of use processing complete
  • 2019-06-10 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2019-06-10 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2019-06-10 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2019-09-03 — Office action issued
  • 2019-09-09 — Assigned to lie
  • 2019-09-17 — Assigned to lie
  • 2019-09-23 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2019-09-23 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2019-09-23 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2019-09-23 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2019-09-23 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2019-10-18 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2019-10-18 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2019-10-18 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2020-06-02 — Application abandoned
  • 2020-06-02 — Application abandoned
  • 2020-06-02 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Vendwatch Telematics LLC
Austin , TX
Vendwatch Telematics LLC
Austin , TX

Correspondent

C. Bentley Harris Akerman LLP
777 South Flagler Drive
Suite 1100, West Tower
West Palm Beach, FL 33401

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2015-06-11
Status Date:
2020-06-02
Filing Year:
2015

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.