Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2015 ›
CR ›
CRYPTOSHOW
Trademark search for:
CRYPTOSHOW
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2015-04-30 — Application filed
2015-05-04 — Application filed
2015-05-12 — Application filed
2015-05-13 — Notice of pseudo mark e-mailed
2015-07-27 — Assigned to examiner
2015-07-29 — Final disposition recorded
2015-07-29 — Final disposition recorded
2015-07-29 — Final disposition recorded
2015-10-29 — Teas change of owner address received
2015-10-29 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2016-01-29 — Office action issued
2016-01-29 — Correspondence received in law office
2016-01-30 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2016-02-04 — Examiners amendment -written
2016-02-04 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2016-02-04 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
2016-02-04 — Examiner's amendment entered
2016-02-04 — Approved for pub - principal register
2016-02-24 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2016-03-15 — Published for opposition
2016-03-15 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2016-05-10 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2016-12-12 — Application abandoned
2016-12-12 — Application abandoned
2016-12-12 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Cryptography Research, Inc.
San Francisco , CA
Cryptography Research, Inc.
San Francisco , CA
Correspondent
SALLY M. ABEL, LINDA M. GOLDMAN Fenwick & West Llp 801 California St Mountain View, CA 94041-1990 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2015-04-30
Status Date:
2016-12-12
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.