Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2015 ›
FP ›
FP FULL PULL CLOTHING CO.
Trademark search for:
FP FULL PULL CLOTHING CO.
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2015-11-18 — Application filed
2015-11-21 — Application filed
2015-11-23 — Application filed
2015-11-24 — Notice of design search code e-mailed
2016-03-10 — Assigned to examiner
2016-03-11 — Examiners amendment and/or priority action - completed
2016-03-11 — Examiner's amendment/priority action e-mailed
2016-03-11 — Notification of examiner's amendment/priority action e-mailed
2016-03-11 — Assigned to lie
2016-03-11 — Combined examiner's amendment/priority action entered
2016-04-22 — Office action issued
2016-04-28 — Correspondence received in law office
2016-04-28 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2016-04-28 — Approved for pub - principal register
2016-05-05 — Law office publication review completed
2016-05-18 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2016-06-07 — Published for opposition
2016-06-07 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2016-08-02 — Teas change of correspondence received
2016-08-02 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2017-03-06 — Application abandoned
2017-03-06 — Application abandoned
2017-03-06 — Final status recorded
2017-04-14 — Undeliverable mail - no action taken
Owner Information
Robinson, Nathaniel Albert-Nolan
Pinole , CA
Robinson, Nathaniel Albert-Nolan
Pinole , CA
Correspondent
ROBINSON, NATHANIEL ALBERT-NOLAN 500 Hyde Street, Apt 601 500 Hyde Street San Francisco, CA 94109
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2015-11-18
Status Date:
2017-03-06
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.