Trademark search for:

INOMA

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2015-06-23 — Application filed
2015-06-26 — Application filed
2015-06-29 — Application filed
2015-09-29 — Assigned to examiner
2015-10-06 — Final disposition recorded
2015-10-06 — Final disposition recorded
2015-10-06 — Final disposition recorded
2016-03-24 — Office action issued
2016-04-06 — Assigned to lie
2016-04-13 — Correspondence received in law office
2016-04-13 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2016-04-15 — Approved for pub - principal register
2016-04-18 — Law office publication review completed
2016-05-04 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2016-05-24 — Published for opposition
2016-05-24 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2016-07-19 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2016-12-29 — Sou teas extension received
2016-12-29 — Sou extension 1 filed
2016-12-29 — Sou extension 1 granted
2016-12-31 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2017-07-18 — Sou teas extension received
2017-07-18 — Sou extension 2 filed
2017-07-18 — Sou extension 2 granted
2017-07-20 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2018-02-19 — Application abandoned
2018-02-19 — Final status recorded
2018-02-20 — Application abandoned

Owner Information

INOMA Corporation
Taipei City 114 TW

INOMA Corporation
Taipei City 114 TW

Correspondent

JOE MCKINNEY MUNCY Muncy Geissler Olds & Lowe P C
4000 Legato Rd Ste 310
Fairfax, VA 22033-2898
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2015-06-23

Status Date:
2018-02-19

Category:
Electronics & Software

Filing Year:
2015

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.