Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2015 ›
JO ›
JOBY BOOSTED
Trademark search for:
JOBY BOOSTED
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2015-03-25 — Application filed
2015-03-28 — Application filed
2015-04-03 — Application filed
2015-06-28 — Assigned to examiner
2015-06-29 — Final disposition recorded
2015-06-29 — Final disposition recorded
2015-06-29 — Final disposition recorded
2015-07-06 — Examiners amendment -written
2015-07-06 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2015-07-06 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
2015-07-06 — Examiner's amendment entered
2015-07-06 — Approved for pub - principal register
2015-07-20 — Assigned to lie
2015-07-24 — Law office publication review completed
2015-08-11 — Withdrawn from pub - og review query
2015-09-30 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2015-10-20 — Published for opposition
2015-10-20 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2015-12-15 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2016-06-13 — Sou teas extension received
2016-06-13 — Sou extension 1 filed
2016-06-13 — Sou extension 1 granted
2016-06-15 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2017-01-16 — Application abandoned
2017-01-16 — Final status recorded
2017-01-17 — Application abandoned
Owner Information
DAYMEN U.S., INC.
Petaluma , CA
DAYMEN U.S., INC.
Petaluma , CA
Correspondent
LAWRENCE H. BINDEROW, ATTORNEY AT LAW Binderow Law Offices 1330 Camino Del Mar Ste 250 Del Mar, CA 92014-2508 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2015-03-25
Status Date:
2017-01-16
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.