Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2015 ›
OP ›
OPENFIRE SYSTEMS
Trademark search for:
OPENFIRE SYSTEMS
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2015-09-16 — Application filed
2015-09-19 — Application filed
2015-09-22 — Notice of design search code e-mailed
2016-01-04 — Assigned to examiner
2016-01-12 — Final disposition recorded
2016-01-12 — Final disposition recorded
2016-01-12 — Final disposition recorded
2016-01-12 — Final disposition recorded
2016-01-12 — Final disposition recorded
2016-01-12 — Final disposition recorded
2016-08-31 — Application abandoned
2016-08-31 — Application abandoned
2016-09-08 — Teas change of correspondence received
2016-09-08 — Office action issued
2016-09-08 — Teas petition to revive received
2016-09-08 — Petition to revive-granted
2016-09-08 — Notice of revival - e-mailed
2016-09-17 — Assigned to lie
2016-09-22 — Correspondence received in law office
2016-09-22 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2016-10-20 — Office action issued
2016-10-20 — Office action issued
2016-10-20 — Office action issued
2017-04-19 — Teas request for reconsideration received
2017-04-19 — Correspondence received in law office
2017-04-19 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2017-04-26 — Assigned to examiner
2017-05-09 — Application abandoned
2017-05-09 — Application abandoned
2017-05-09 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
OPENFIRE SYSTEMS
MILLERS CREEK , NC
Correspondent
DAVID TAMER 3000 BETHESDA PL STE 703 WINSTON SALEM, NC 27103
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2015-09-16
Status Date:
2017-05-09
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.