Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2015 ›
SE ›
SENTRYPOINT
Trademark search for:
SENTRYPOINT
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2015-10-20 — Application filed
2015-10-23 — Application filed
2015-10-24 — Application filed
2015-10-27 — Notice of pseudo mark e-mailed
2016-02-10 — Assigned to examiner
2016-02-16 — Final disposition recorded
2016-02-16 — Final disposition recorded
2016-02-16 — Final disposition recorded
2016-08-17 — Teas petition to revive received
2016-08-17 — Petition to revive-granted
2016-08-17 — Office action issued
2016-08-18 — Notice of revival - e-mailed
2016-08-25 — Assigned to lie
2016-09-01 — Correspondence received in law office
2016-09-01 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2016-09-09 — Approved for pub - principal register
2016-09-12 — Law office publication review completed
2016-09-28 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2016-10-18 — Published for opposition
2016-10-18 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2016-12-13 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2017-06-13 — Sou teas extension received
2017-06-13 — Sou extension 1 filed
2017-06-13 — Sou extension 1 granted
2017-06-15 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2017-12-13 — Teas change of correspondence received
2017-12-13 — Sou teas extension received
2017-12-13 — Sou extension 2 filed
2017-12-15 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2017-12-15 — Sou extension 2 granted
2017-12-16 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2018-03-29 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2018-03-29 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2018-06-13 — Sou teas extension received
2018-06-13 — Sou extension 3 filed
2018-06-13 — Sou extension 3 granted
2018-06-15 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2018-09-24 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2018-09-24 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2018-11-27 — Teas statement of use received
2018-11-27 — Use amendment filed
2018-11-27 — Teas change of correspondence received
2018-11-29 — Statement of use processing complete
2018-11-29 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
2018-11-30 — Notice of acceptance of statement of use e-mailed
2019-01-01 — Registered-principal register
2021-04-30 — Teas change of owner address received
2021-04-30 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2021-04-30 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2021-04-30 — Teas withdrawal of attorney received-firm retains
2021-04-30 — Teas change of correspondence received
2021-04-30 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2021-12-15 — Teas change of owner address received
2021-12-15 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2021-12-15 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2021-12-15 — Teas change of correspondence received
2021-12-15 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2023-06-08 — Teas change of owner address received
2023-06-08 — Teas change of correspondence received
2023-06-08 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2023-06-08 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2023-06-08 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2024-01-01 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
2025-07-11 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2025-07-11 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Synaptics Incorporated
SAN JOSE , CA
Synaptics Incorporated
San Jose , CA
Synaptics Incorporated
San Jose , CA
Correspondent
Anne E. Naffziger Leydig, Voit & Mayer, Ltd. The Atrium Building, 1981 N. Broadway Suite 375 Walnut Creek, CA 94596
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2015-10-20
Status Date:
2025-07-11
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.