Brandinium

Trademark search for:

SMART INTEGO

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2015-08-28 — Application filed
  • 2015-12-17 — Sn assigned for sect 66a appl from ib
  • 2015-12-28 — Application filed
  • 2015-12-28 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2015-12-28 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2015-12-29 — Office action issued
  • 2016-01-01 — Application filed
  • 2016-01-06 — Office action issued
  • 2016-01-06 — Office action issued
  • 2016-01-22 — Office action issued
  • 2016-07-06 — Office action issued
  • 2016-07-06 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2016-07-07 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2016-07-28 — Office action issued
  • 2016-07-28 — Office action issued
  • 2016-07-28 — Office action issued
  • 2017-01-30 — Teas request for reconsideration received
  • 2017-01-30 — Ex parte appeal-instituted
  • 2017-01-30 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
  • 2017-01-30 — Exparte appeal received at ttab
  • 2017-02-07 — Office action issued
  • 2017-02-07 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2017-02-07 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2017-02-08 — Assigned to lie
  • 2017-02-09 — Data modification completed
  • 2017-05-17 — Notification of possible opposition sent to ib
  • 2017-05-17 — Notification of possible opposition created, to be sent to ib
  • 2017-05-22 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
  • 2017-05-23 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2017-05-24 — Exparte appeal terminated
  • 2017-06-03 — Notification of possible opposition - processed by ib
  • 2017-06-14 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
  • 2017-06-14 — Notice of start of opposition period created, to be sent to ib
  • 2017-06-14 — Notification of possible opposition sent to ib
  • 2017-07-01 — Notification processed by ib
  • 2017-07-04 — Published for opposition
  • 2017-07-04 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
  • 2017-09-19 — Registered-principal register
  • 2017-12-19 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2018-01-11 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2018-01-11 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2018-02-10 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2018-03-23 — Limitation of goods received from ib
  • 2018-03-29 — Limitation from the ib examined and entered
  • 2018-03-30 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
  • 2018-03-30 — Correction under section 7 - processed
  • 2018-08-01 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2018-11-30 — Partial invalidation of reg ext protection created
  • 2018-12-04 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2018-12-08 — Invalidation reviewed - no action required by office
  • 2019-03-21 — Teas petition to director received
  • 2019-06-19 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2019-06-19 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2019-07-23 — Assigned to petition staff
  • 2019-07-24 — Petition to director granted
  • 2019-07-26 — Review of correspondence complete - certificate of reg mailed
  • 2022-09-19 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 71 (6-yr) e-mailed
  • 2024-04-05 — Cancelled section 71
  • 2024-04-05 — Final status recorded
  • 2024-12-06 — Total invalidation of reg ext protection created
  • 2025-01-15 — Invalidation processed
  • 2025-01-16 — Total invalidation of reg ext protection sent to ib
  • 2025-02-01 — Total invalidation processed by the ib

Owner Information

SimonsVoss Technologies GmbH
DE
SimonsVoss Technologies GmbH
DE
SimonsVoss Technologies GmbH
DE

Correspondent

Catherine F. Hoffman Dickinson Wright PLLC
350 East Las Olas Blvd, Suite 1750
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2015-08-28
Status Date:
2024-04-05
Filing Year:
2015

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.