Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2015 ›
TH ›
THINK UNIQUE
Trademark search for:
THINK UNIQUE
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2015-02-04 — Application filed
2015-02-07 — Application filed
2015-02-17 — Application filed
2015-05-11 — Assigned to examiner
2015-05-18 — Approved for pub - principal register
2015-06-03 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2015-06-23 — Published for opposition
2015-06-23 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2015-08-18 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2016-02-16 — Sou teas extension received
2016-02-16 — Sou extension 1 filed
2016-02-16 — Sou extension 1 granted
2016-02-18 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2016-06-13 — Teas change of owner address received
2016-06-13 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2016-08-16 — Sou teas extension received
2016-08-16 — Sou extension 2 filed
2016-09-09 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2016-09-09 — Sou extension 2 granted
2016-09-10 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2017-02-17 — Sou teas extension received
2017-02-17 — Sou extension 3 filed
2017-02-17 — Sou extension 3 granted
2017-02-21 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2017-09-18 — Application abandoned
2017-09-18 — Application abandoned
2017-09-18 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Candy House Inc.
Palo Alto , CA
Candy House Inc.
Palo Alto , CA
Correspondent
BRITT L. ANDERSON K&l Gates Llp 630 Hansen Way Palo Alto, CA 94304-1022 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2015-02-04
Status Date:
2017-09-18
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.