Brandinium

Trademark search for:

A ANGRY PROPELLER

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2016-06-13 — Application filed
  • 2016-06-16 — Application filed
  • 2016-06-18 — Application filed
  • 2016-06-21 — Notice of design search code e-mailed
  • 2016-09-22 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2016-10-03 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2016-10-03 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2016-10-03 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2017-02-13 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2017-02-13 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2017-02-13 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2017-02-13 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2017-02-14 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2017-03-08 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
  • 2017-03-28 — Published for opposition
  • 2017-03-28 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
  • 2017-04-26 — Extension of time to oppose received
  • 2017-06-26 — Opposition instituted no. 999999
  • 2017-10-05 — Opposition terminated no. 999999
  • 2017-10-05 — Opposition sustained no. 999999
  • 2017-10-05 — Application abandoned
  • 2017-10-05 — Application abandoned
  • 2017-10-05 — Final status recorded
  • 2017-11-17 — Undeliverable mail - no action taken

Owner Information

Putian Zhongteng Xinda Trading Co.,Ltd
Putian,Fujian CN
Putian Zhongteng Xinda Trading Co.,Ltd
Putian,Fujian CN

Correspondent

WENG ZHILIANG
LONGHUA NEW DISTRIC WEIDONGLONG TECHNOL
SHENZHEN GUANGDONG,
CHINA

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2016-06-13
Status Date:
2017-10-05
Filing Year:
2016

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.