Trademark search for:

DEXCOM PRO

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2016-11-21 — Application filed
2016-11-24 — Application filed
2016-11-29 — Application filed
2017-02-10 — Assigned to examiner
2017-02-13 — Final disposition recorded
2017-02-13 — Final disposition recorded
2017-02-13 — Final disposition recorded
2017-07-28 — Office action issued
2017-07-28 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2017-07-28 — Correspondence received in law office
2017-07-31 — Approved for pub - principal register
2017-08-23 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2017-09-12 — Published for opposition
2017-09-12 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2017-11-07 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2018-02-06 — Sou teas extension received
2018-02-06 — Sou extension 1 filed
2018-02-06 — Sou extension 1 granted
2018-02-08 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2018-10-19 — Sou teas extension received
2018-10-19 — Sou extension 2 filed
2018-10-19 — Sou extension 2 granted
2018-10-23 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2019-04-26 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2019-04-26 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2019-06-10 — Application abandoned
2019-06-10 — Application abandoned
2019-06-10 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

DexCom, Inc.
San Diego , CA

DexCom, Inc.
San Diego , CA

Correspondent

N. Christopher Norton Arent Fox LLP
1717 K St., NW
Washington, DC 20006
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2016-11-21

Status Date:
2019-06-10

Category:
Electronics & Software

Filing Year:
2016

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.