Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2016 ›
RA ›
RAFESPA
Trademark search for:
RAFESPA
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2016-05-11 — Application filed
2016-05-14 — Application filed
2016-05-16 — Application filed
2016-05-17 — Notice of pseudo mark e-mailed
2016-06-25 — Assigned to examiner
2016-06-25 — Final disposition recorded
2016-06-25 — Final disposition recorded
2016-06-25 — Final disposition recorded
2016-12-05 — Office action issued
2016-12-27 — Assigned to lie
2016-12-29 — Correspondence received in law office
2016-12-29 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2016-12-30 — Approved for pub - principal register
2017-01-05 — Law office publication review completed
2017-01-18 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2017-02-07 — Published for opposition
2017-02-07 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2017-04-04 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2017-04-25 — Teas delete 1(b) basis received
2017-04-25 — Notice of allowance cancelled
2017-05-15 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2017-05-17 — 1(b) basis deleted; proceed to registration
2017-06-20 — Registered-principal register
2022-06-20 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
2024-01-05 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2024-01-05 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
DENSO CORPORATION
Aichi-pref. JP
DENSO CORPORATION
Aichi-pref. JP
DENSO CORPORATION
Aichi-pref. JP
Correspondent
GEOFFREY D. AURINI HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCE, P.L.C. 5445 CORPORATE DR STE 200 TROY, MI 48098-2683 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2016-05-11
Status Date:
2024-01-05
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.